21 Jump Street
Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum ’s reboot of21 Jump Streethad every rationality to fail , and the film itself target this out . It was a movie adaptation of a television receiver show , which seldom works out , and the TV show is barely have intercourse by today ’s audiences . And yet , by having both meta commentary and literal tutelage for its characters , it becameone of the most darling and inspired drollery in recent memory . It was quickly follow by a sequel,22 Jump Street , and when that was even more successful , there were calls for a threequel . But five years later , we still have n’t seen23 Jump Street . So , here are 5 Reasons23 Jump StreetShould Get Made ( And 5 Why It Should n’t ) .
Should: Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum are a terrific on-screen pair
In the first twoJump Streetmovies , it ’s undeniable that Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum make for a fantastic on - screen pairing . They intelligibly sleep together working with each other and bask shooting every aspect they share , which create a manic comedic energy , and they both lend out the best in each other ’s comic talent . They ’ve appeared alongside each other in the Coens’Hail , Caesar!and as credit card superheroes inThe LEGO Moviefranchise , and Hill was responsible forget Tatum his cameo inThis is the remainder , but they have n’t co - starred in a pic since22 Jump Street , and23 Jump Streetcould be the staring ground to get them back on - screen together .
Shouldn’t:22 Jump Street’s credits already took the air out of its tires
During22 Jump Street ’s end credits , we saw posters and teaser for a horde of sequels to stick with , in which Schmidt and Jenko bust drug rings in a medical schoolhouse , a Sunday shoal , a flight schooltime , a fireman schooltime , and also a bunch of twist - off media like display panel game , video game , action mechanism figures , and something starring Richard Grieco calledJump Street : generation . If there was any Bob Hope of anotherJump Streetmovie that manage to feel as revolutionize as the first two while keeping one step ahead of the interview , that montage necessitate all the zephyr out of its tire .
Should: It could go even further than the22 Jump Streetcredits gag
Sure , the remnant credits of22 Jump Streetsort of ruined any chances that23 Jump Streetcould’ve had of giving the audiences more metaphor for the franchise selling out . But that just present an chance to go even further with it . Maybe even process that montage as canon , and suddenly video game and action figures of Schmidt and Jenko exist .
They could become aware that they ’re in a movie franchise , catch up with in a meter loop , retrograde the same plot over and over again . TheJump Streetmovies have winked at the audience with quotation to declaration disputes and budgetary excision , but they ’ve never perish fullDeadpool . The franchise has endure so far on subverting the audience ’s expectation , so it should go all in for the third film .
Shouldn’t: Too much time has passed since22 Jump Street
After21 Jump Streetbecame a surprisal off back in 2012 , Sony struck while the branding iron was live and brought out22 Jump Streetin 2014 . The subsequence was n’t just a hit ; it was an even expectant strike than the original . But the studio apartment and film maker involved have let half a ten slip by since they made22 Jump Street . In a sense , that ship has sailed . Audiences would still change by reversal out to see23 Jump Street , and it certainly would n’t be a flop , but the box office receipts would probably be a lot blue than the first two — and a lot humbled than it would ’ve been if the threequel was release in 2016 .
Should: It could satirize threequels
22 Jump Streetgot hatful of comic mileage out of being a subsequence . The characters make perpetual denotation to doing the same thing all over again and how it ’s always sorry the second time . A likely third pic would still be a sequel , but it would n’t have to echo any of the original ’s comment on sequels , because it ’s a threequel , which is a completely unlike thing .
Threequels are infamously the sturdy movies , because oftheir obligation to round out the trilogy . Maybe Nick Offerman ’s character could say in his monologue at the get-go that succeeding the second time was a trematode , and succeeding a third time is even more difficult , because the commissioner expect a sense of closure .
Shouldn’t: Hill and Tatum’s careers have moved on
Back in 2012 , when21 Jump Streetcatapulted Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum into a new strata of stardom ( “ You got ta find another ceiling and you get ta bust through that one , and you just got ta keep forge ceilings … ” ) , Hill was a drollery superstar and Tatum was a more traditional lead serviceman with surprising comedic chop . However , now their career have evolved into something solely different . Tatum has n’t had an on - screen role in a mates of year andhe ’s get ready to tear his first motion-picture show as director . Hill moved into more spectacular territory andalso started head . Their careers have moved on from theJump Streetfranchise .
Should: It would be better than aMen in Blackcrossover
When Sony gall North Korea with its plan to releaseThe Interview , a chemical group calling itself the Guardians of Peace hacked the studio ’s serversand leaked hundreds of e-mail and a few soon - to - be - unblock films . Among these email was a plan to produce a crossover between theJump StreetandMen in Blackfranchises . Since the computed axial tomography was out of the grip and audiences were cross , the project was quickly shelved . A straight sequel to22 Jump Street , continuing the physical body on the dealership ’s meta philosophy , would be much better thanwhatever theMen in Blackcrossover was run low to be .
Shouldn’t: Phil Lord and Christopher Miller have signed with another studio
TheJump Streetmovies have been distributed by Sony and MGM , and the two studios have some kind of atomic number 27 - ownership deal on the enfranchisement , but Phil Lord and Christopher Miller — the duo that direct the late two picture and infuse the series with its unique self - cognisant sense of humor — just signed a first - spirit raft with a unlike studio apartment , Universal . With this new deal , the director probably would n’t have the clock time to direct anotherJump Streetmovie . If the sequel does get made , they ’ll probably administrator - produce for another director , but with someone else at the helm , it just wo n’t be the same .
Should: We need to see more of Captain Dickson
Ice Cube will always be best know for his medicine because he ’s an incredible rapper , but considering it ’s something he does in his unembellished time , he ’s surprisingly brilliant at funniness . And the fictional character of Captain Dickson in theJump Streetfranchise is arrant for his esthesia . Cube gusto Dickson ’s extended rants and insult humor in the first yoke ofJump Streetmovies and it would be a delicacy to see him playing that graphic symbol again .
In fact , since22 Jump Street , his son O’Shea Jackson , Jr. hasemerged as a prominent , gifted new actor(with a proven funny bone , as go out alongside Seth Rogen inLong Shot ) , so he could even come on display panel as Dickson ’s son .
Shouldn’t:Jump Streetwould become what it was critiquing
TheJump Streetfranchise has always been a critical review of Hollywood ’s overreliance on the conversant . The first one made fun ofreviving an sure-enough , mostly forgotten intellectual propertyin an attempt to make money . The second one made sport of the mere mind of a “ second one , ” and then made fun of the contraband cakehole of starting a franchise , as the creators sell out more and more until they have an exalt series and a vulgar Tin Can Alley . Deep down , we all know that the first twoJump Streetmovies endure together as a complete piece and there ’s no need to make a third one , so if23 Jump Streetgets made , the franchise will have become exactly what it was review .
NEXT:5 Reasons We call for To See Lethal Weapon 5 ( & 5 Why We Do n’t )
