Related
Daniel Radcliffe has ended up in quite a tricksy position career - wise . On the one hand , he has become a great actor and seems so incredibly lovely as a someone that it ’s almost unbelievable . On the other handwriting , he is arguably one of the most illustrious faces in cinema , which terminate up typecast him a picayune .
While this inclination is designed to search the wider career of Radcliffe , you should still be prepared for a major inflow ofHarry Pottercontent alongside his lesser - hump show . Let ’s check out his five best and five worst roles , according to the IMDb .
BEST: Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows Part 1 (2010): 7.7
The first part of the spectacular close to theHarry Potterfranchise isThe Deathly Hallows Part 1 . It might not be the most intense , action - impenetrable moving picture in the world , but the sheer length of metre Harry , Ron andHermionespend in the forest does provide a lot of interesting character development .
People may not have liked Radcliffe ’s acting in the earlier film , but it ’s impossible to deny that he has better by this point .
WORST: Now You See Me 2 (2016): 6.5
The continuation to the Jesse Eisenberg - starring , twist - heavy , magic spectacularNow You See Medidn’t do near to receiving the reception of its predecessor .
However , it did innovate Daniel Radcliffe into its ensemble cast and he does very well in his purpose as Walter Mabry , Arthur ’s ( Michael Caine ) boy .
BEST: Harry Potter And The Goblet Of Fire (2005): 7.7
The Goblet Of Firemight be built on a concept that seems so dramatic and important that for certain it would have been mentioned at some point in one of the three long time Harry had been at Hogwarts so far , but its spectacular actions sequences and the transition Harry and Ron undergo from barren children to dark teenagers is great .
WORST: The Woman In Black (2012): 6.4
Despite coming from a classic horror novel , The Woman In Blackdidn’t get the critical review it was striving for , no matter how well - find Radcliffe ’s performance was .
One interesting fact : whenThe Woman In Blackwas first adjust for the filmdom back in 1989 , Adrian Rawlins read on the starring role that Radcliffe is now known for . That very same actor operate on to play James Potter ( Harry ’s Church Father ) in theHarry Potterfranchise .
BEST: Harry Potter And The Prisoner Of Azkaban (2004): 7.9
Despite being directed by the least famous of all of theHarry Potterdirectors , The Prisoner Of Azkabanis often seen as the most cinematically bright film in the serial .
It looks corking , it sound unbelievable and the plot line is the most unique of them all , even if it does have some very dodgy time travel . This is another thing you ’d really retrieve would be mentioned more often …
WORST: Guns Akimbo (2019): 6.3
One of Radcliffe ’s most recent films see the ex - child star taking on the lead part of Miles . The film might be a passel darker thanHarry Potter , but the comedic thread running through it keeps thing light - hearted .
The 6.3 rating reflect that the film has pretty much been considered perfectly average .
BEST: Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead (2017): 8.1
The only non - Wizarding World film that makes it into Daniel Radcliffe ’s top five best role according to IMDb isRosencrantz & Guildenstern Are bushed .
Never heard of it ? That ’s because it ’s actually a take version of a stage product . Radcliffe executes a role that Sirius Black himself ( Gary Oldman ) recreate in the 1990 moving-picture show to perfection , while the idea to focus on two venial Hamlet type is a genius one .
WORST: Victor Frankenstein (2015): 6.0
This 2015 film is based around various modern adaptations of the tarradiddle ofFrankenstein , told from the view of the titular Dr. ’s assistant , Igor , who is played by Radcliffe .
It stop up as a vast box office bomb and received almost solely negative critical review .
BEST: Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows Part 2 (2011): 8.1
TheHarry Potterfilm was a cinematic spectacular when it was unloosen in 2011 . Fans flocked to see the massive saga draw to a close and they were n’t disappointed . The movie is , in marrow , a two - hour - foresighted natural process sequence .
Seeing Daniel Radcliffe depart from a graphic symbol he has embody since he was 11 years old as a human race ( and , inthe flash - forward , quite an old military man ) is rightfully emotional .
WORST: Beast Of Burden (3.6)
Radcliffe ’s lowest followup comes from the 2018 action mechanism filmBeast Of Burden . It ’s a lifeless , unoriginal and frankly very boring moving picture that does n’t do anything original or exciting . Radcliffe is the star : a pilot burner smuggling cocaine across the US border while dealing with the Cartel , the DEA and his man and wife .
NEXT : Harry Potter : heavy Ways The Weasleys Changed From Philosopher ’s Stone To Deathly Hallows
