Related
There are few franchises , if any , in the world ofpop culture that has dominatedin the same means thatStar WarsandHarry Potterhave in the retiring few decades . They have dedicated fandoms , huge traditional knowledge , and a series of fantastic and beloved films to their names .
They have some similar aspects but are in general very dissimilar franchise . But which is more naturalistic ? There are a variety of gene to expect at when answering that question , and we look at a few of them here .
Species & Creatures
Species and creatures is a unusual category when considering the realness of these franchises . Right off the bat , both have man , so call off each other out in that respect .
Harry Potteris filled with humans and then wizardly creatures like Hippogriffs , Goblins , and Trolls , whileStar Warshas a broad variety of Galaxy - all-embracing mintage and creatures . SinceStar Warshas various species andcreatures spread across multiple planetsand star system , it automatically becomes more realistic , as their being can only be bear under the belief that in the infinite place , there is some other life . It is hard to guess the creatures ofHarry Pottercould rest concealed on Earth alone , and all reside there .
Winner : Star war
Technology
Technology is another inept category as the two uses in these franchises is so vastly unlike . Set in the ninety , tech is relatively thin inHarry Potter , whereas inStar war , it is everywhere .
The magical folk ofPotterdo not habituate much technology , whereas muggles and no - maj ’s have matter like televisions etc . Star Warshas applied science around every corner , but despite this , Pottergets the nod . For one , the tech inStar Warsis so out there , and seemingly so out of reach of our imaginations , on top of that itneverdevelops , it remain stagnant for hundreds of years , which itself is unrealistic .
Winner : Harry Potter
Politics
As divisive as it may be , political science is a Brobdingnagian part ofStar Wars , and also a fully grown part ofPotter , withStar Warshaving the Republic , the Empire , etc . andPotterhaving the Ministry of Magic , the Magical Congress of the U.S , etc .
The various Republics inStar Warsfunction as centralise governments with exponent deteriorate to the various wandering governments that behave as countries , withHarry Potteradopting a similar country by body politic approach . They are equal in terms of pragmatism , except one stretches across the Galaxy with planet acting as country , and one enshroud on Earth .
success : attractor
Day-To-Day Life
The worlds ofHarry PotterandStar Warsare not all just about Jedi and Sith , and the teachings of Hogwarts . There is everyday life , and regular stuff to do .
Potterhas place like Diagon Alley and Hogsmead , billet to tope , Quidditch league , shopping , butterbeer , and a variety of other childlike life activities , and people with canonic jobs . Star Warshas the same , gambling , casinos , cantinas , games , sportswoman , and the same range of jobs and natural process . There can not be a realistic macrocosm without a liveliness past the grandiose of it all , and both these franchises look into that boxful .
Setting
TheStar Warsstories take place famously in a Galaxy far , far aside , Harry Potter , however , take property in England , America , and the simple planet Earth .
While the magical macrocosm gets hold back from the muggle world , it is credible that with the reasons devote to us for the magical humans never having been distinguish . Ultimately , while the events and thing within that Galaxy are naturalistic in the linguistic context of a far away Galaxy , England is a much more realistic setting in that it exists without a doubt .
Major Battle
struggle and wars are huge parts of both these franchise , literally in the name of one .
The victor here is obvious ; StarWarsis build around , and based on real - life event , transfer them to space phantasy , but maintaining the same wholeness . Dogfights , battle tactic , samurai sword engagement , monolithic scale wars for soil and political action , it is Earth history , much more naturalistic than the Battle of Hogwarts .
Lightsabers Vs. Wands
Lightsabers are perhaps the most iconic weapon in all of film history , with thePotterwands for sure near the very top of that listing .
But which is more realistic ? While there are still someiffy aspects of the lightsaberin terms of how much sense they make , they still hold far more realism than wand . The part of a lightsaber are well known , and we have ensure the process of their creation , scepter are mysterious and prefer their wizard as a especially crafted piece of wood with magical factor , iconic , darling , but not that realistic .
Any Historical Foundation?
This agent just relates to if there is any known noesis or foundation garment for these franchise here on Earth , whether people prescribe to the impression or not .
Harry Potterundoubtedly takes this . Star Warsmay be base on event from Earth , but other than the idea of space , ace , and a far-off Galaxy , Star Warsis fancy with no literal connection to past traditional knowledge on Earth . Harry Potter derives a lot from thaumaturgy , which has been a known thing on Earth for years with witches , wizards , broomsticks , dragons , wands , etc . While it is not definitive , having a whole library of lore to pull from with information on the topics makes the existence of the franchise easy to comprehend .
Magic Vs. The Force
Perhaps the most vital ingredient in play off these franchises against each other in terms of how naturalistic they are is the two occult forces holding them together ; magic and the Force .
The origins of magic are unknown ; whether it is ghostlike or biologic , it just come from within the witch or mavin . The Force flows through every living being in theStar WarsGalaxy , with a someone ’s prowess in its use coming from midi - chlorians . As divisive as they are , midi - chlorians make this loose as because they are a biologic thing , in a far aside Galaxy with all different components from our own , it is easier to hold them more realistic than something that is a total mystery , and channeled mostly through a magical wand
Results
With four categories to three in this list , Star Warscomes out on top as more naturalistic .
However , this list is not definitive ; there are so many factors to look at that could bung the scales inPotter’sfavor . There are so many arguments on each side for the elements on this list , such as magic trick vs. the Force , or tipping the scales on one of the draw class .
NEXT : Star Wars Vs . Harry Potter : 10 Hilarious Memes That Make Fans pluck Sides
