Related
The man ofHarry Pottercontinues to have many mysteries that J.K. Rowling either has n’t gotten to answer or simply refuses to , such asone of the steps in the making of a horcrux . One question fans had for years was why the horcrux in Harry Potter was n’t killed by the basilisk inHarry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets – luckily , there ’s a undecomposed account for that , and Rowling in reality corroborate it years ago . Readers around the creation were introduced to the Wizarding World in 1997 withHarry Potter and the Philosopher ’s Stone , the first in what would become a successful ledger series with a amount of seven novels .
The story of the boy who lived was accommodate to the giving CRT screen between 2001 and 2011 , with the 7th book , Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows , being split into two films . TheHarry Potterfilm seriesexpanded this universe ’s fanbase , and also left a crew of question and a couple of plot holes that have n’t been answered yet , even though Rowling has addressed some of them in interviews , entries inWizarding World(formerlyPottermore ) , or random Q&A academic term on Twitter .
Related : Harry Potter : Everyone Voldemort kill To Make Horcruxes ( & Why )
Among the many questions floating in the mind ofHarry Potterfans was why the horcrux in Harry Potter was n’t put down when he was bitten by the basilisk in the second book / picture , Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets – after all , he used the creature ’s fang to destroy another horcrux ( Tom Riddle ’s journal ) . Harry ’s horcrux was eventually destroy in the final record book , but could it have been killed years before ?
Harry Potter: Why The Basilisk Couldn’t Destroy Harry’s Horcrux
InHarry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets , Harry finds Ginny Weasley inside the Chamber of Secrets withTom Riddle , who was a retention preserved in his journal for decades . Through the diary , Riddle manipulated Ginny into reopening the Chamber , and Harry learned that Tom Riddle was Lord Voldemort ’s past . Riddle summons the basilisk after Harry express his support for Dumbledore , which in twist summonsFawkes , who blinds the basilisk , allowing Harry to look at it instantly without being killed or petrify . Fawkes get with the Sorting Hat , which produces the Sword of Gryffindor , which Harry uses to stamp out the Basilisk , though he ’s injured by one of its fangs in the physical process .
With the fauna ’s toxicant now in him , Harry take the fang and stabs Riddle ’s diary , destroying the piece of Riddle / Voldemort ’s soul in it . The basilisk ’s poison was strong enough to demolish a horcrux , urinate fans wonder why the one in Harry did n’t die when he was burn by the giant snake . As it turn out , Fawkes not only saved Harry but also the part of Voldemort ’s someone living in him . Fawkes healed Harry ’s injury with its tears , and it also healed the horcrux inside of him , which is why by the time Voldemort and Harry fit at the wood inDeathly Hallows , Harry was able to die and come back . Rowling shared back in 2015that a horcrux can only be destroy if its container is damaged beyond repair , which was n’t the case inChamber of Secretsthanks to Fawkes .
Harry indeed had to go bad in Holy Order to have the horcrux in him demolish , so if Fawkes had n’t arrived to facilitate , the piece of Voldemort ’s soul live in Harry would have been defeat by the basilisk ’s toxicant at that minute . Horcruxes bear on to be a theme of discussion amongHarry Potterfans , but at least the mystery of why the basilisk did n’t kill the one in Harry has already been figure out .
Next : Harry Potter Theory : Dumbledore Is Death In The Deathly Hallows
