John Carter
John Carterremains one of Disney ’s big and costliest floating-point operation , and here ’s everything that went wrong with making the picture show . The 2012 sci - fi action movie , based on the influential Barsoom series by Edgar Rice Burroughs , was intended as a munificent , big - budget , CGI - heavy extravaganza that would allow the studio to keep up with the like of Marvel , James Bond , andStar Trekat the time .
Disney pumped everything they had into theJohn Cartermovie : an Oscar - pull ahead conductor ; an up - and - coming leading man surrounded by industry bombination ; one of the bad report budgets ever for a live - action movie ; and more than 2,000 visual - issue shots . It was meant to be a sure - fervency hit , a blockbuster to rival the likes ofThe AvengersandThe Hobbittrilogy . or else , it led to Disney reporting a $ 200 million write - down on the picture show . With a full toll of $ 350 million , including an estimated production budget of $ 263 million , John Carteronly made $ 284.1 million worldwide .
The fiscal failure ofJohn Carterhas come to instance Disney ’s current mold of line : remakes , reboots , and acquisitions are good investing , but trying to establish unexampled enfranchisement and megahit tentpoles outside of those intimate nostalgic properties is where cataclysm lie . This notably happened with movies likeA Wrinkle in Time , Tomorrowland , The Lone Ranger , The Nutcracker and the Four Realms , and , most recently , Artemis Fowl . What should have been another video display of Disney ’s indomitable strength chop-chop became a cautionary taradiddle . So , why on the dot didJohn Carterflop as stunningly as it did ?
John Carter Wasn’t A Popular Enough Brand To Be Successful
However , the oeuvre itself has , over the decennary , mostly been omit in party favor of that which it tempt . To audiences of the 2010s , John Carter and Barsoom are n’t recognisable dimension . It ’s not unacceptable to set up a nine - public figure blockbuster based on such cloth but , as hoi polloi have reckon over the past decade , it ’s become increasingly hard to make big dollar with movies that are n’t either superhero film , Star Warssequels , remake of Disney sketch , or reboots of nostalgic transportation . There may be some die - laborious Barsoom fans out there but it ’s dubious there was enough of them in those key demographic Disney appeal to to justify such a costly endeavor . Name recognition alone does not make a motion-picture show bang . Just postulate the most recentTarzanreboot for grounds of that , or Disney ’s own attempt to makeThe Lone Rangera 21st century action mechanism favorite .
John Carter Focused Too Much On Setting Up A Sequel
One of the major stumbling blocks for wannabe franchises of the past ten has been the mistaken desire to replicate the mold pioneer by superhero movies . give that , by the timeJohn Carterpremiered in 2012 , major superhero film such as theX - Menfilms , The Dark Knighttrilogy , and the burgeon Marvel Cinematic Universe had already find tremendous succeeder and help to dramatically change the blockbuster game , it ’s not hard to see why such prospects would be tantalizing to studios , including to Disney themselves . If they made it exploit with superheroes then why not test it out with one of the tarradiddle that help to lay the groundwork for that genre ?
In an effort to play catch - up to a franchise that spent years break its elaborately woven multiple narratives , many studio test to do the work of three or four movies in one . This result in a deal of franchise non - starting motor because audiences had trivial interest in films that existed solely to lay up a bunch of sequels for a prop they did n’t care about . This happenedArtemis Fowlas well as expanded creation such asRobin HoodandKing Arthur : Legend of the Sword . John Carterfell into a similar curing of problems . While there was some delight to be obtain in watch the lavishly depicted humankind of Barsoom be unveiled to viewers , it was n’t enough to sustain a moving picture and did n’t entice enough the great unwashed to invest in a trilogy that would never see the light of twenty-four hour period .
John Carter Was Filmed Like An Animated Movie, Not Live-Action
John Carter was the pipe dream shaver of Andrew Stanton , one of the first employee of Pixar and the Oscar - win theatre director ofWALL - EandFinding Nemo . Stanton was such a fan of Burroughs ' body of work that he lobbied Walt Disney Studios to re - acquire the photographic film right to the Barsoom stories , which they had initially owned in the eighties following give way plans to create their own competitor toStar Wars . Stanton then landed the film director gig for the flick despite never having made a bouncy - action film before . He was consider a dependable stakes in large part because of the money his animate movie had made for the company over the geezerhood .
In fairness , it certainly made sentiency to allow someone used to working with G of visual - effects shots take the reins of a project that demanded such an extended amount of CGI . However , even Stanton himself would admit that his inexperience in the live - action medium had caused problems for Disney and the movie . As he would explain toThe New York Times : " The affair I had to excuse to Disney was , ' You ’re asking a guy who ’s only known how to do it this way to suddenly do it with one reshoot . ' I say , ' I ’m not gon na get it right the first time , I ’ll tell you that flop now . ' "
Stanton assign his hesitation on such topic to his vitality background , andThe New York Timesreported that he"leaned intemperately on his co-worker at Disney - own Pixar for counselling , paying less attention to input from multitude with experience in bouncy - action filmmaking . “In fair-mindedness to Stanton , it seems that he was not appropriately hold by the top managers at Disney at the time , who also did not possess much experience in working with these massive live - action mechanism blockbusters . The end upshot was fundamentally a movie that had been film as an revivify project rather than take on as a flick mean to be live - action ; while there are similarities in the process , they are still basically dissimilar .
John Carter’s Budget Made It Tough To Be Successful
It ’s now not only coarse to see film with reported budgets between $ 200 and 300 million but it ’s also the average for many of these studio tentpole title . All but one of the ten most expensive films ever made were released in the past decade , and Disney produced eight of them . This is now the condition quo for blockbuster cinema , an earned run average of too - big - to - fail filmmaking that is almost alone reliant on international grosses just to break even . John Carter , which is ninth on that listing thanks to its nett budget of just under $ 264 million , is the only film of those ten that was n’t part of a pre - established dealership . Even if it were , throwing a one-fourth of a billion dollars at any movie in 2012 was a dire peril .
A film be $ 264 million needs to make , at the very least , $ 660 million worldwide to break even . Realistically address , Disney was probably skip thatJohn Carterwould bring in closer to $ 800 million or so . And the fact of the matter is , only a few dozen picture ever farm , by that point in time , had earned that amount of money at the box business office . make a right adjustment of the epic Barsoom stories required that horizontal surface of financial and originative investment but audiences are less impressed by these overwhelming display of CGI and sci - fi splendour today . To put it flat out , audiences had envision it all before by the timeJohn Carterreleased .
John Carter Had A Terrible Marketing Campaign
John Carter ’s unsuccessful person ca n’t be put at the feet of one specific aspect of the movie but its endless stumbles in the selling section for certain made its journey to success all the more unrealizable . First , the decisiveness to take a story originally titledA Princess on Marsonly to vary it toJohn Carter of Marsraised a peck of questions over who Disney wanted to sell the motion-picture show to . Oft - refuted Hollywood logic insist that stories about man are universally appealing while stories about cleaning lady are only interesting to other women , although that ’s never stood up to scrutiny at Disney given how they make their decennium - recollective steel off the backs of princess stories . Andrew Stanton take up it even further by overleap the “ of Mars ” part of the title altogether , claiming that it made more sensation for the fiber and would help the movie appeal to a large-minded audience . or else , it hook the pic of its identity . John Carteras a title conveyed nothing to possible audiences about the pic they were being sell .
Matters were n’t helped by the flick ’s overall promotion . Stanton pushed for marketing ideas that , grant to those who worked on the movie , failed to carry the necessary message . Ideas such as the selection of using Led Zeppelin ’s song " Kashmir " in the drone made the film seem more retro than desired . The trailers did n’t excite , nor did the preview reel put together for devotee at D23 in 2011 . By the time the movie relinquish , Varietylamented thatJohn Carterwas being “ treated like a corpse ” , a collapse - in - waiting that everyone , from fans to critic to Disney themselves , was quick to push aside as a nonstarter . In the close , it did n’t even matter that the reviews forJohn Carterwere relatively strong . There was just no exuberance around it and audiences catch on chop-chop that this movie , as expensive and hotly hyped as it was , would not be the epic striking that the studio was hoping for . AfterJohn Carterdisappeared from field of operations , Disney allow the rights to the Barsoom story to revert back to Edgar Rice Burroughs ’ estate of the realm , putting the final nail in the coffin of Andrew Stanton ’s dream for an immense Mars saga .
Next : former 2010s Blockbuster Movies Were Very Different : What ’s Changed
