Related
Until a few old age ago , theStar Warsprequel trilogy was universally panned by both diehard buff and free-and-easy moviegoers . But as the millennials who grew up with the prequels have become outspoken adults and Disney ’s endeavor at a sequel trilogy has shown ushow quicklyStar Warscan go off the railswithout George Lucas — or just a undivided guiding creative vision — the prequels have come to be reconsidered . They ’re still deeply blemished movies , but there ’s also a mickle to apprize in these products of unrestrained creativity . So , here are 5 matter TheStar WarsPrequel Trilogy Did Wrong ( % 5 It Did Right ) .
Wrong: Overreliance on CGI
To be fair to George Lucas , CGI was in its infancy when he made theStar Warsprequel trilogy , and he was one of the pioneers at the forefront of its technological advancement . At the meter , the ability to satisfy the frame with all kinds of computer - generated schlock was a refreshing trinket .
Lucas was so excited by the new technology that he did n’t feel like ruin the prequel trilogy ’s aesthetical with an abundance of naive CGI effects was enough andhe went back into the original trilogy to break that , too , with the so - called “ Special Editions . ” The prequels ’ overutilisation of CGI is cark , especially now that CGI technologies have gotten even well .
Right: Ewan McGregor’s performance as young Obi-Wan Kenobi
Ewan McGregor could ’ve well gone down in film chronicle as an Alden Ehrenreich when he took on the role of new Obi - Wan Kenobi in theStar Warsprequel trilogy . Alec Guinness made Kenobi an image of the silver medal screen as he mentor Luke Skywalker through the original trilogy , and as one of the greatest actors who ever inhabit , Guinness was tough to comply up .
But McGregor crushed it . He brought all - new flairs to Obi - Wan ’s character while honoring his legacy . He be the character ’s young self without just doing an Alec Guinness impression . We ’ll in conclusion be seeing more of McGregor ’s Obi - Wan in an upcoming Disney+ series .
Wrong: Messing up the continuity
When he first conceivedStar Wars , George Lucas saw it as a six - part storey ( or a nine - part story , or a twelve - part story , depending on what rumour you believe ) and he chose to tell the quaternary part first intentionally to draw in fans with the most exciting part . Lucas knew the news report in broad diagonal , but adapted each part as he came to really bring it to the screen , which is why Luke and Leia kiss inEmpire , then get revealed as twins inJedi .
Unfortunately , the prequels mess up some of the continuity when you line them up with the original trilogy . How did Leia call back so much about her female parent if she died during childbirth ? Why did the Death Star take thirty years to construct ? Why did n’t Artoo think anyone ?
Right: Music and sound design
John Williams and Ben Burtt uphold to apprehend the melodious musical score and the reasoned intention forStar Wars , severally , when George Lucas fetch them back for the prequels . On Williams ’ end , he composed course such as “ Duel of the Fates ” and “ struggle of the Heroes ” that werejust as breathless and immediately memorable as original trackslike “ The Imperial March ” and “ The Force Theme . ”
On Burtt ’s ending , he never failed to astound when he ’d come up with a speech sound for something that does n’t be that ends up working perfectly . Just look at Obi - Wan ’s seismal commission inAttack of the Clones , which is a beautiful sound effect — and delay it because of the quad mount was a skillful touch .
Wrong: Cringeworthy romantic dialogue
You do n’t need to tell George Lucas that he ’s not the most gifted writer of amatory dialogue , because he ’s the first to admit it himself . While Lucas is a veritable hotshot in the art of storytelling , drawing mainly on Japanese cinema and comparative mythology , he slip up in some areas of the carrying out . This is why Carrie Fisher had to punch up the original trilogy ’s dialogue on - set .
Sadly , she was n’t around to do the same for the prequels . Lucas allowed Hayden Christensen and Natalie Portman to rewrite a lot of their negotiation , but“I do n’t like sand ” still made the cut .
Right: Continually expanding the Star Wars universe
George Lucas has said latterly that his biggest job withThe Force Awakenswas its involuntariness to take risk of exposure . With all of hisStar Warsmovies , he continued to expand the universe of discourse . The prequel trilogy introduced us to Coruscant , the monarchy of Naboo , the Wookiees ’ household planet Kashyyyk , the Trade Federation , the Jedi Council — even when the prequels took us back to Tatooine , we were shown new corners of Tatooine .
It ’s gentle to appreciate how much George Lucas strive to expand the worldbuilding in the prequels after five years of Disney relying entirely on nostalgia from the original trilogy ’s iconography .
Wrong: Drawn-out political discussions
audience come toStar Warsmovies for the escapism . They also want to see the good continuation of the saga ’s on-going story and revisit their favorite characters , but primarily , the charm is that virginal escapism . We all have mundane lives andStar Warsmovies tender us a probability to leave those life behind and scarper to a galaxy far , far off for a couple of hours .
The fun of this galaxy is thatit ’s full of spaceships blowing each other up , so it was disappointing to have to sit around through prospicient , make - out political debates in the prequel trilogy . The original trilogy had political commentary — it was George Lucas ’ allegoric criticism of the Vietnam War — but the political aspects were hidden in the spectacle .
Right: Ian McDiarmid’s performance as Palpatine
After polarize theStar Warsfan base withThe Last Jedi , Disney went hell for leather withThe Rise of Skywalkerby bringing back Ian McDiarmid as Emperor Palpatine , who supposedly died inReturn of the Jedi . It was a huge risk and it ’s unclear how it ’ll give off . But one matter is for sure : McDiarmid will continue to sweep through the character .
The doer has always done a wondrous Book of Job of act as the part ’s Darth Sidious persona as a snarling , moustache - spin menace . And the prequels gave him a chance to roleplay the Chancellor Palpatine side with a deceptive campiness , hiding the Sith Lord within . He anchored the prequel trilogy more than Anakin himself did .
Wrong: Jar Jar Binks
George Lucas will defend this character until the day he dies . Apparently , Jar Jar is his favoriteStar Warscharacter . It ’s not Han Solo or Darth Vader or Leia Organa or Obi - Wan Kenobi;it ’s Jar Jar Binks .
role player Ahmed Best confront a lot of the rebound for this character , and that ’s not really fair , because the character was essentially flawed from his creation — it ’s not Best ’s fault ; it ’s what he was cave in to work out with . Aside from being irritate beyond all belief , Jar Jar is a cartoonish merger of several offensive ethnical stereotype . He ’s just haywire all over . Fans ’ hatred is justify .
Right: Sticking the landing
As much as fans are divided overThe Phantom MenaceandAttack of the Clones , mostStar Warsfans can agree thatRevenge of the Sithis a jolly unspoilt flick that successfully enwrap up the trilogy . It ’s not a perfect motion picture by any mean value , butit does have its moments — and more importantly , it ’s a satisfying bridge between the events of the prequel trilogy and the events of the original trilogy .
It does n’t apply the fact that it can end with the beginning ofA New Hopeas a crutch ; it tells its own level in its own time , withthe heartbreaking worked up proceeds of Obi - Wan and Anakin ’s climactic lightsaber battlefeeling earned .
NEXT : Star warfare : 5 Things The Prequel Trilogy Did good Than The Sequel Trilogy ( & 5 Things The Sequels Are Doing Better )
