The Invisible Man

The unseeable Mancontinues to receivecritical praisefor its intricate and complex depiction of a toxic relationship , including the way the abuser frame   other people like his sidekick for his legal action . The film   presents and analyze a myriad of ways in which an opprobrious partner can psychologically keep in line his dupe , but it is perhaps this   calculated endeavor to   twirl a web of cabal so as to remove his reprehensible accountability that makes themonstrous Adrian so chilling .   It is   at first   confutable that he truly committed the flagitious acts in the movie when it is revealed his brother had the invisible suit , but this ambiguity serves to   enunciate just how   skillful Adrian is at   sowing dubiousness .

The narration structure ofThe Invisible Manserves to localize the audience in the office of Cecilia , who   struggles to prove that Adrian is the one excruciate her with hisinvisibility suit . Even though no one else in the movie believes her , the spectator recognize that she is   the target of Adrian ’s intrigue . However , just like her , the audience ask to estimate out how , exactly , the invisible threat   thinks in orderliness to deduce what his next design will be .

Related : The Invisible serviceman : What take place to the Dog ?

Article image

This is why the reveal that Adrian ’s buddy , Tom , was   also wear the suit and participating in the schemes comes as a surprise . Cecilia was sure that Adrian was following her the whole time and was the culprit behind the tragedies she bear , so he remained one stride ahead of her and shifted the incrimination to   Tom . It seems like a convoluted plan , but it ’s an effective means of maintain his control over Cecilia once it became clear he could not continue to invisibly stalker her forever .

Adrian Framed His Brother As a Way of Gaslighting

The audience may doubt Adrian ’s culpability during the final minute of the movie . His story is legal , especially because he set himself up as the dupe of his blood brother ’s act . However , when he eats dinner party with Cecilia , that chilling " surprise " he verbalize mimic the same   threat he whispered sooner in the movie , strongly implying that he did , in fact ,   frame   his brother for his crime . This may not offer enough evidence for a sound royal court , but it ’s enough toconvince both Ceciliaand the audience of Adrian ’s guilt .

Thetwist involve the two brothersmay have beena percentage point of criticismfor some since it   calls into question the timing of the   suit switch . However , the result confusion intentionally addle the validity of Cecilia ’s claims while also making the audience question everything that has befall to her . It is Adrian ’s way of gaslighting his dupe , twisting the reality of the events that transpired throughout the film to make himself seem innocent . what is more ,   Adrian ’s   plot see that he is able to   restart his relationship with Cecilia and prove that his architectural plan was to immobilize her with him in a life together all along .

Part of the reason why Adrian is such an effective villain is that he is successful in his attempts to deflect   the   truth , even to film viewer .   There still remains guess about when , exactly , Adrian may have transferred the suit over to   Tom , but his role in the plot is clean-cut . He is a lord at manipulation , using his brother to carry out his dirty work ,   prove his innocence in the eyes of the jurisprudence , and ultimately ensure his distorted reunion with his ex - wife .   These superimposed plan are what makeThe inconspicuous Mansuch an effectively vivid psychological thriller .

Adrian looking pensive

Next : The Invisible Man Director Reveals What fall out if Cecilia Keeps [ SPOILER ]

Michael Dorman as Tom Griffin in The Invisible Man

The Invisible Man