Joker: Folie a Deux

AlthoughJokerintroduced Arthur Fleck ( Joaquin Phoenix ) and his newfound evil persona , he might not be the real Clown Prince of Crime , instead making room forJoker 2to introduce the substantial DC baddie . Todd Phillips ’ version of Batman ’s archenemy offered a Modern origin story for the character in a film that was built as a standalone one - off – but nothing is ever coiffe in stone in the film diligence , especially afterJoker ’s huge box office success , which is a handsome motive for the studio apartment to move forward with a sequel .

Jokerfollowed failed stand - up comic Arthur Fleck who turned to a life history of offense in Gotham City after being constantly neglected by society . Jokerhad a big impingement even before it was released , with many field taking special measures to ensure all their visitant were safe ( and some even choosing to not block out the film at all ) . Viewers witness Arthur ’s conversion into a offence icon , but there ’s still more to explore and reply about the case – peculiarly because that might have not been the actual Joker .

Related : Joker 2 Will Have To reply The Original Movie ’s Best Mystery

Joker: Folie A Deux official poster

It was initially reported thatWarner Bros. had already begun developingJoker 2with Phillips back as director and Joaquin Phoenix also on board to reprize his role , but this was speedily close down as it was revealed thatWarner Bros. had n’t even start negotiations yet . That does n’t have in mind that a continuation will never happen ( it just might take a snatch longer ) , and when it does , it will be the thoroughgoing opportunity to introduce the real Joker without leave Arthur Fleck behind .

Arthur Fleck Might Not Be The REAL Joker

BeforeJokercame out there was a batch of talk aboutArthur not being the last version of the Joker , instead acting as the source of inspiration for the literal villain . The main argument used to support this is that Arthur is too old to be Batman ’s enemy : Jokeris go under in 1981 , and Arthur is already in his mid - forties . Bruce Wayne , on the other hand , was present as a 9 - year - old . By the time Bruce becomes the Dark Knight , Arthur would be in his belated L , and even if he managed to remain fit enough to agitate Gotham ’s hero , there would n’t be much time for theBatman / Joker dynamicto be develop properly .

Arthur is n’t precisely a man with a program , which is one of the Joker ’s most defining characteristics , and instead the clown riots emerged as a issue of an “ accident ” from his part ( that is : killing three Wayne Enterprises man of affairs in ego - defence ) . Even when he ’s in full Joker style atMurray Franklin ’s talk show , his speech and actions ( away from kill Franklin on the spot ) do n’t seem to have been planned beforehand , and he certainly was n’t expect his goggle box appearance to trigger major chaos in the metropolis . Another clue is how the name “ Joker ” is used somewhat softly in the moving-picture show , with Murray Franklin mock Arthur on his show by predict him that and Arthur later asking him to stick in him as Joker . And that ’s it .

The idea ofArthur not being the final personification of the Jokeris not far - fetched , as Phillips himself has suggest Phoenix ’s lineament might rather be the inspiration for the actual DC scoundrel – and that would be a very interesting idea to research inJoker 2 .

Joker real DC villain

touch : DC Characters Joker Could Fight In The subsequence ( That Are n’t Batman )

Joker 2 Can Introduce The True Character

Just because Arthur is n’t the real Joker does n’t intend that the first film is n’t an origin story . Arthur ’s political orientation , actions , and the riots enliven by him could be the base for the emergence of the Clown Prince of Crime as fans have total to know it . The real Joker would be someone – perhaps with a alike background – that grew up worship what Arthur did or was revolutionise by him , as they share the same ideas about high society . This character would then become the full formed translation of the Joker , Batman ’s eternal foe who is on par physically and mentally ( in terms of intelligence and strategy , not in saneness ) with the Dark Knight .

That meansJokerwould still be an origin story , though not for Arthur but for this part that will carry on with what Arthur set off . This would give Phillips and company a lot of options to explore , as theJoker has a good number of backstorieswith no definitive origin established for add together to the character ’s mystery and danger , as he ’s the most treacherous storyteller ever . Or they could also take advantage of the Joker ’s bad computer storage and make a new backstory for the film , while also provide some whodunit to it .

How Joker 2 Can Be About Arthur AND A New Joker

insert the true Joker does n’t meanJoker 2has to bequeath Arthur behind – there are some things they have to puzzle out about his story , after all . The sequel could do so while also presenting this new character that will go on to become one of DC ’s most famous villains , and Arthur could be part of   his journey either directly or indirectly . The most obvious path would be Arthur mentor the literal Joker , mirroring in a sour and villainous way all those superhero beginning stories where the independent graphic symbol has a wise man .

Another way Arthur could be an participating part   of the Joker ’s journey is by working against him . Because Arthur is not a direct   adaptation   of any previous version of DC ’s villain , it ’s unknown if there ’s a redeeming tone to him or how his stop at Arkham Asylum could affect him this clip . Arthur might not agree with the Joker ’s motivations ( or perhaps he ’s getting it all wrong ? ) , and chooses to do something about it , which does n’t needs mean becoming a hero or a good person . This would also be a learning experience for the new fibre , and would add to his motivations and overall psychopathologic tendency .

On the other hand , these two could never meet , with Arthur instead serving as a form of “ celebrity ” and part example to the real Joker , and their narrative could be developed at the same time inJoker 2without them ever crossing paths . Whatever the future holds for aJokersequel , fans can be certain that Phillips wo n’t take the task lightly , and will hopefully answer some of the biggest secret and questions the first film leave , including if Arthur Fleck is the real DC villain or not .

Joaquin Phoenix as Arthur Fleck in Joker

Next : What Needs To Happen In The Joker Sequel

Joker triumph

Joker backstage

Movies

Joker: Folie à Deux