Hannibal
Anthony Hopkins ' portrayal of Hannibal Lecter inSilence of The Lambsmade the eccentric noted , but some sayHannibalstar Mads Mikkelsen best him . Hannibal began sprightliness in a popular series of novel by source Thomas Harris , but unsurprisingly , it ’s the motion-picture show and television versions of the cannibalistic character that the majority of people recognize . Book lovers may not like that , but it ’s the verity , as it ’s easygoing to check a movie or episode into the average person ’s busy life than it is to witness time to read a novel .
It ’s not really disputable that when most find out the nameHannibal Lecter , the effigy that bulge out into their head is Hopkins ' interpretation of the not so well doc . The Silence of the Lambswas a critical and commercial-grade knock , cleaned up at the Oscars , and is arguably one of the greatest films ever made . Hopkins is a grownup factor in that succeeder , despite not really being in the film that long , as he makes every 2nd counting .
Related : How Hannibal Could Have Remade Silence of the Lambs
When aHannibalTV showwas announced , many rooter flout at the estimate that Hopkins could be replaced in the role , at least until they saw Mads Mikkelsen ’s mesmerizing take . So , once and for all , it ’s time to settle who played Hannibal unspoiled , Hopkins or Mikkelsen ?
Who Was A Better Hannibal? Anthony Hopkins vs. Mads Mikkelsen
It ’s important to note right away that this is not a battle of who ’s most iconic . For the intellect advert above , Anthony Hopkins easily make headway that wash . However , part of the reason so many fans came to loveMads Mikkelsen ’s Hannibal public presentation is just how otherwise he play it than Hopkins . Mikkelsen is much more understated in the role , and also speaks with a thick accent mark that more closely conform to Hannibal ’s roots in eastern Europe . While Hopkins always seems like a viper waiting to come across , albeit a charmingly sophisticated one , it ’s surd to ideate how he was able to pass as normal for so long before being see . Mikkelsen ’s Hannibal is more subtly manipulative , and calm , all while being no less dangerous .
This difference ca n’t just be chalked up to Hopkins ' Hannibal being locked up and Mikkelsen ’s being free , and for the first two season , uncaught , either . When Hopkins ' Hannibal is live freely in Italy in the 2001Hannibalmovie , there still always seems to be something off about him , particularly in the means he looks at people like a athirst shark . Mikkelsen ’s Hannibal , even once caught and caged , still mostly asseverate his tranquil demeanor , and reckon means of arrest into people ’s oral sex . In a freaky way , it ’s not hard to see why both men and women seem to become infatuate with him so quickly , even if the episodic red flag emerges alluding to his secluded life .
However , while Mikkelsen’sHannibalis probably creepy-crawly and more seductive , Hopkins ' Hannibal is scarier , in the sense that when he becomes enraged , all bets are off and he will absolutely go demoniacal . His violent disorder at the end ofSilence of the Lambsis legendary for good reason . It ’s a close call , but we feel Mikkelsen just barely edge out Hopkins in overall public presentation , also excelling when called upon to be menacing . Still , both performances are great in their own ways , and fans ca n’t go wrong with either .
More : All The Hannibal Lecter Movies Ranked , Worst To Best
